European Western Balkans

Croatia's arguments for blocking negotiations are legally unfounded

Saša Obradović

TANJUG_maliBELGRADE – Croatia’s blockade of opening Chapter 23 in accession negotiations between Serbia and the EU is legally unfounded, say Serbian lawyers who believe that the Croatian request for Serbia to waive its jurisdiction over war crimes committed on the territory of the former Yugoslavia is completely unfounded.
The authority Serbia has is based on the international law principle of universal jurisdiction, applied in Croatia as well as in the majority of European Union member-states.

Saša Obradović, legal representative of the Serbian government in The Hague, believes that there are no grounds for Serbia to change its law and waive the universal jurisdiction, pointing out that it is Serbia’s international obligation to prosecute those who commit war crimes, regardless of their national or ethnic affiliation, and the same applies to Croatia.

Obradović said that the provisions of Serbia’s Law on Organization and Competence of Government Authorities in War Crimes Proceedings (2003) vest jurisdiction in Serbia’s special court to conduct proceedings for criminal offences committed on the territory of the former Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia, regardless of the citizenship of the perpetrator or victim.

Universal jurisdiction, he said, was considered as playing a vital role in the effective enforcement of International Humanitarian Law and the International Committee of the Red Cross believed that all states should exercise universal jurisdiction over war crimes committed during international and non-international armed conflicts.

Related posts

Protocol of third session defining mechanisms for cooperation between Montenegro and Slovenia signed

EWB Archives

US Senate to vote on Accession Protocol of Montenegro to NATO by Thursday

EWB Archives

Erhard Busek visits RCC Secretariat in Sarajevo

EWB Archives